Should Massachusetts phase out rebates for new oil- and gas-fired systems for heat and hot water?
Recently I was asked by the Boston Globe to write 350 words on why the Mass Save energy efficiency program should...
Retail electricity prices keep rising everywhere, causing pocketbook anxiety among consumers and political anxiety among elected officials. Some of our public servants suggest cutting back on clean energy commitments to make energy affordable. They are obviously being egged on by disinformation campaigns run by the fossil fuel industry. Nonetheless, it is becoming increasingly clear that New England’s overdependence upon natural gas for heat and electricity is one of the main energy cost drivers (along with overspending on utility infrastructure and their profits).
We wrote a blog about natural gas just a couple of weeks ago, citing recent work from Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and the Brattle Group, as well as data and statements from the organization that manages the New England power grid, ISO-NE.
But here’s reporting from Bloomberg News that should cast doubt on a retreat from energy efficiency and renewable energy being a good idea.
So, if you get a chance to communicate with a state legislator or your governor, don’t let them glibly tell you that we need an “all of the above” energy strategy. We already have “all of the above” – with too much natural gas. Wind, solar, batteries, and good old-fashioned energy efficiency are all better, faster, and cheaper than power from methane.
Recently I was asked by the Boston Globe to write 350 words on why the Mass Save energy efficiency program should...
On Monday, those of us who were working to defeat a proposal in the Mass. House of Representatives that would roll...
Comments