Automakers and the fossil fuel lobby have been campaigning across the country to undermine, delay, or destroy key regulations to reduce pollution from vehicles. In the next few days, it’s critical we all take action to defend these regulations to protect public health and fight climate change. We don't mean two weeks from now. We mean now.
In this blogpost, we’ll cover how to take two actions (each will only take 3 minutes!) and then provide more context on what’s going on below. If you take action, email us at drivegreen@greenenergyconsumers.org to let us know!
Massachusetts is due to start implementing the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACCII) regulations, which steadily transition sales of new vehicles to electric vehicles (EVs) over the course of a decade, with Model Year 2026; Rhode Island, with Model Year 2027. Nationwide, Governors are under pressure to delay implementation by several years. Governors need to hear now that delay is unacceptable. Strengthen your message by adding a paragraph about why you personally care about fighting climate change and reducing air pollution.
In Massachusetts, you can reach Governor Maura Healey’s office at (617) 725-4005 or via this form.
In Rhode Island, you can reach Governor Dan McKee’s office at (401) 222-2080 or via this form.
Call or email your governor with the message below.
Dear Governor ____
My name is ____ and I am a constituent, residing in zip code ____. I am calling on you to stay the course and implement the Advanced Clean Cars II regulations – do not delay. The ACCII regulations are key to protecting public health, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and protecting consumer choice. Without them, we will not meet our required greenhouse reductions and our air quality and public health will get worse. At a time when we are seeing so many rollbacks regarding clean energy and clean air at the federal level, it is critical that our state stands strong.
The Trump Administration is attempting to undo states’ authority to implement Advanced Clean Cars II (as well as other key vehicle emissions regulations). They've submitted for congressional review the “waiver” (basically, the permission slip) that the states received from the Environmental Protection Agency to implement these standards. We’ve learned that the House of Representatives is due to vote on this issue on Wednesday, April 30. We do not expect our federal delegations in Massachusetts or Rhode Island to vote in favor of overturning these EPA waivers, but letting them know how you feel is always a good idea – especially these days.
To take action, follow these steps:
Find the contact information of your Representative. You can use this tool with your zip code.
Call or email them with this message:
Hi, my name is _______, and I’m a constituent living in _______, ZIP code _______.
I’m calling to urge Rep. ________ to vote ‘no’ on attempts to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn EPA waivers for vehicle pollution programs (H.J. Res. 87, H.R. Res. 88, H.J. Res. 89).
We need these vehicle pollution programs to protect our climate and our health. I’m also very concerned about the precedent set by improper use of the CRA and what that could mean for other programs I care about.
Thank you for your time.
Email us at drivegreen@greenenergyconsumers.org to let us know you took action!
Generally, it is the job of the federal government – the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) – to regulate vehicle emissions and efficiency. That happens through rules like the CAFE standards and multi-pollutant emissions standards, which the Trump administration is targeting too.
However, the state of California can issue stricter regulations than those of the federal government, and other states can choose to adopt California’s standards under what’s known as Section 177 of the Clean Air Act. Before it can implement these standards, California must receive a waiver from the EPA.
The Biden Administration granted this waiver for three key vehicle regulations:
The Trump Administration has identified all three regulations as targets and has submitted them to Congress for review under the purview of the 1996 Congressional Review Act (CRA). The CRA allows Congress to overturn "rules of general applicability” from executive agencies. However, the waivers granted by EPA are not one of these rules that are subject to the CRA; they are an “adjudication”. We know that’s a lot of legalese, but the key point is: the CRA cannot be used to rescind EPA waivers.
The House is expected to vote on this issue next Wednesday, April 30. (In the Senate, the Senate Parliamentarian recently determined that the waiver is not subject to the CRA. It remains to be seen what next steps will be in that chamber.) If the House votes to overturn the EPA waivers, that’s bad news for climate and public health. But it also sets a dangerous precedent and opens up many other waivers in the clean energy space but also many other sectors. Opposing this misuse of the CRA is about protecting key climate regulations and protecting the separation of powers within our government. (The Supreme Court is also hearing arguments about whether energy producers (read: the fossil fuel industry) can sue the EPA over the waiver for ACCII.)
Meanwhile, governors across the country are under a lot of pressure from industry to delay implementation of these regulations even while this federal fight is ongoing. Rhode Island has adopted all three standards and will start implementation with model year 2027. Massachusetts adopted all three standards as well, but delayed implementation of HDO until model year 2026 back in October 2024 and announced a two-year period of “enforcement discretion” for ACT earlier this month. We know there’s a national push by automakers and the fossil fuel lobby to make ACCII the next target. Maryland already announced a delay by executive order, with no opportunity for public comment.
ACCII is designed to facilitate the gradual transition of the fleet to electric vehicles (EVs) by requiring manufacturers to increase the availability of EVs year over year. The obligation to comply sits with automakers, not dealers or customers. Compliance is entirely feasible thanks to the variety and availability of passenger EVs, flexibilities built into the rule, and Massachusetts' and Rhode Island's strong support for electrification via complementary state programs, not to mention the ingenuity and leadership of businesses across our two states.
We need ACCII to:
If states do not implement vehicle standards like ACCII – either because of federal action or state delay - it will be impossible for Massachusetts and Rhode Island to meet their 2030 greenhouse gas emissions reduction requirements in the transportation sector. It will also adversely affect other states that have adopted these standards as well, such as California, New York, and several others (all listed here). So, join us in taking action today!
Join our webinar on May 1st at 12PM to:
Comments